The Effect of Alkyl Substituent Length on Receptor Properties of Dithiaaza-Сrown-Hemicyanine MonolayersThe Effect of Alkyl Substituent Length on Receptor Properties of Dithiaaza-crown - Hemicyanine Monolayers

A. V. Shokurov,^a A. V. Alexandrova,^a,b E. V. Lukovskaya,^c V. V. Arslanov,^a and S. L. Selektor^a@

Dedicated to Academician Aslan Yu. Tsivadze on the occasion of his birthday

^aA.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia

^bD.I. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia

^cM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Chemistry Department, 119991 Moscow, Russia

^@Corresponding author E-mail: sofs@list.ru

DOI: 10.6060/mhc171140s
Macroheterocycles 2017 10(4-5) 560-566

Planar supramolecular systems based on Langmuir monolayers of chromoionophores are widely used for sensor applications, and crown ether ionophoric groups are intensively studied. However, almost no attention is devoted to investigation of effect of alkyl moieties onto receptor properties of such systems. In the present work, we carry out a comparative study of Langmuir monolayers of three alkylated dithiaaza-crown substituted hemicyanine chromoionophores differing only in number of carbon atoms (12, 16, 21) in the hydrophobic alkyl substituent. A dependence of receptor properties of the studied monolayers on the length of alkyl chain is revealed. It is shown that the efficiency of mercury cations binding by both liquid-expanded and compressed monolayer of dithiaaza-crown substituted hemicyanine dyes formed on pure water subphase is identical for all three compounds with various length of alkyl chain substituent due to the key role of the interactions between chromoionophore fragments of neighboring molecules at the interface. Degree of system sensitivity enhancement due to barium cation-induced preorganization increases with increase of number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain.

References:

Click here to expand or collapse this section

1. Fabbrizzi L., Poggi A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 24, 197.
https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9952400197

2. Kolesnichenko I.V., Anslyn E.V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2385–2390.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00078B

3. Kim J. Supramolecular Assemblies of Conjugated Sensory Polymers and the Optimization of Transport Properties. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. 190 p.

4. Atwood J.L., Davies J.E.D., MacNicol D.D., Vogtle F. Molecular recognition: Receptors for cationic guests. In: Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 1 Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1996. p. 635–655.

5. Gromov S.P., Dmitrieva S.N., Vedernikov A.I., Kurchavov N.A., Kuz'mina L.G., Sazonov S.K., Strelenko Y.A., Alfimov M.V., Howard J.A.K., Ushakov E.N. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 9834–9847.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jo401555a

6. Lukovskaya E., Glazova Y., Fedorov Y., Bobylyova A., Mizerev A., Moiseeva A., Anisimov A., Peregudov A., Fedorova O. Dye. Pigment. 2014, 104, 151–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.12.027

7. Selektor S.L., Shcherbina M.A., Bakirov A.V., Batat P., Grauby-Heywang C., Grigorian S., Arslanov V.V., Chvalun S.N. Langmuir 2016, 32, 637–643.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04075

8. Bell T.W., Hext N.M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 589–598.
https://doi.org/10.1039/B207182G

9. dos Santos C.M.G., Harte A.J., Quinn S.J., Gunnlaugsson T. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 2512–2527.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2008.07.018

10. Kumar A., Sun S.-S., Lees A.J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 922–939.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.023

11. Selektor S.L., Shokurov A.V. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2015, 51, 171–203.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205115020161

12. Gwon S.-Y., Rao B.A., Kim H.-S., Son Y.-A., Kim S.-H. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 144, 226–234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.02.094

13. Kuz'mina L.G., Vedernikov A.I., Dmitrieva S.N., Howard J.A.K., Gromov S.P. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2007, 56, 1003–1012.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-007-0151-8

14. Tsuchiya T., Shimizu T., Hirabayashi K., Kamigata N. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3480–3485.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jo020668r

15. Bach R.D., Vardhan H.B. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1609–1610.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00359a046

16. Lai M.-T., Shih J.-S. Analyst 1986, 111, 891.
https://doi.org/10.1039/an9861100891

17. Li J., Yim D., Jang W.-D., Yoon J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2437-2458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00619A

18. Siswanta D., Nagatsuka K., Yamada H., Kumakura K., Hisamoto H., Shichi Y., Toshima K., Suzuki K. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 4166–4172.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac960396q

19. Lochman L., Svec J., Roh J., Novakova V. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 121, 178–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.05.020

20. Batat P., Grauby-Heywang C., Selektor S., Silantyeva D., Arslanov V., McClenaghan N., Jonusauskas G. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2823–2833.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201402112

21. Thaler A., Bergter R., Ossowski T., Cox B.G., Schneidera H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999, 285, 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1693(98)00253-9

22. Halfpenny J., Rooney P.B., Sloman Z.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6223–6226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01033-9

23. Bradshaw J.S., Krakowiak K.E., Izatt R.M. The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, Aza-Crown Macrocycles. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. 885 p.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470187388.ch1

24. Berdnikova D.V., Fedorova O.A., Tulyakova E.V., Li H., Kölsch S., Ihmels H. Photochem. Photobiol. 2015, 91, 723–731.
https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12405

25. Fedorova O.A., Fedorov Y.V., Vedernikov A.I., Yescheulova O.V., Gromov S.P., Alfimov M.V., Kuz'mina L.G., Churakov A.V., Howard J.A.K., Zaitsev S.Y., Sergeeva T.I., Möbius D. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 543–553.
https://doi.org/10.1039/b110630a

26. Prodi L., Montalti M., Zaccheroni N., Dolci L. Top. Fluoresc. Spectrosc. 2005, 9, 1–57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23335-0_1

27. Bashmakova N.V., Shaydyuk Y.O., Levchenko S.M., Masunov A.E., Przhonska O.V., Bricks J.L., Kachkovsky O.D., Slominsky Y.L., Piryatinski Y.P., Belfield K.D., Bondar M.V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 4502–4509.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp503263f

28. Li Y., Wei F., Lu Y., He S., Zhao L., Zeng X. Dyes Pigm. 2013, 96, 424–429.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.09.010

29. Dix J.P., Voegtle F. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 457–470.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.19801130206

30. Shiraishi Y., Miyamoto R., Hirai T. Langmuir 2008, 24, 4273–4279.
https://doi.org/10.1021/la703890n

31. Tatay S., Gavi-a P., Coronado E., Palomares E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3857–3860.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ol0615580

32. Sun W., Guo S., Hu C., Fan J., Peng X. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7768–7817.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00001

33. Shokurov A.V., Silant'yeva D.A., Arslanov V.V., Selektor S.L. Macroheterocycles 2016, 9, 395–401.
https://doi.org/10.6060/mhc160855s

34. Caseli L., Moraes M.L., Zucolotto V., Ferreira M., Nobre T.M., Zaniquelli M.E.D., Rodrigues Filho U.P., Oliveira O.N. Langmuir 2006, 22, 8501–8.
https://doi.org/10.1021/la061799g

35. Apetrei C., Alessio P., Constantino C.J.L., de Saja J.A., Rodriguez-Mendez M.L., Pavinatto F.J., Ramos Fernandes E.G., Zucolotto V., Oliveira O.N. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 2513–2519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.10.047

36. Rodriguez-Mendez M.L., Antonio de Saja J. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2009, 13, 606–615.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1088424609000814

37. Hussain S.-A., Bhattacharjee D. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 23, 3437–3451.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984909021508

38. Grauby-Heywang C., Selector S., Abraham E., Jonusauskas G. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2011, 47, 31–38.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205111010059

39. Wang Z., Huang Y., Huang C., Zheng J., Cheng H., Tian S. Synth. Met. 2000, 114, 201–207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00261-7

40. Stuchebryukov S.D., Selektor S.L., Silantieva D.A., Shokurov A.V. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2013, 49, 189–197.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205113020044

41. Traube J. Justus Liebig's Ann. Der Chemie 1891, 265, 27–55.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.18912650103

42. Selektor S.L., Raitman O.A., Silant'eva D.A., Ivanova N.V., Yonusauskas G., Lukovskaya E.V., Batat P., Arslanov V.V. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2011, 47, 484–493.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205111040174

Attachment	Size
mhc171140s.pdf	952.08 KB

Журнал "Макрогетероциклы"

Navigation

Languages

News

Search

The Effect of Alkyl Substituent Length on Receptor Properties of Dithiaaza-Сrown-Hemicyanine MonolayersThe Effect of Alkyl Substituent Length on Receptor Properties of Dithiaaza-crown - Hemicyanine Monolayers

References: